According to Serrano V. Priest, what did affluent districts reportedly achieve in relation to education?

The reasoning behind selecting better educational outcomes is based on the findings from Serrano v. Priest, which highlighted disparities in educational quality across school districts. The case focused on how funding mechanisms led to inequality in educational opportunities, with affluent districts often having access to more resources. As a result, students in wealthier areas typically benefited from better instructional materials, experienced teachers, and enhanced school facilities, enabling them to achieve higher levels of academic success compared to those in less wealthy districts. This relationship between affluence and educational achievement underscores the systemic issues in funding education based on local property taxes and reinforces the argument for a more equitable funding model.